Skip to main content

Hargrove v. State

Citations

  • 162 S.W.3d 313
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 1287
  • 2005 WL 375305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that accused’s statement that he wanted to “terminate it” was ambiguous and did not require the officer to stop questioning
  • holding that accused’s statement that he wanted to “terminate it” was ambiguous and did not require the officer to stop questioning
  • holding that accused’s statement that he wanted to ―terminate it‖ was ambiguous and did not require the officer to stop questioning
  • finding that appellant implicitly waived his rights where he was read his rights, indicated that he understood his rights, and proceeded to discuss the offense
  • finding that appellant implicitly waived his rights where he was read his rights, indicated that he understood his rights, and proceeded to discuss the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Gardner, McGOY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.