Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 12/5/2014

Harewood v. Braithwaite

Citations

  • 64 F. Supp. 3d 384
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169182
  • 2014 WL 6867942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, on a motion to set aside the verdict, the Court must draw all inferences in non-movant’s favor
  • declining to find a prolonged detention where, among other factors, officers had not suppressed evidence
  • denying Rule 50(b) qualified immunity defense where “[t]here is no indication from the colloquy between the court and defense counsel that Defendants intended to maintain their qualified immunity defense.”
  • quotingRusso v. City of Bridgeport, 479 F.3d 196, 209 (2d Cir.2007)
  • “Second Circuit precedent has placed the right to be free from false arrest well beyond the point of debate.”
  • “The touchstone of an unreasonable detention claim is the existence of egregious conduct by an officer in connection with specific, readily-accessible, exculpatory evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.