Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/11/2003

Hardee v. Hardee

Citations

585 S.E.2d 501
355 S.C. 382
2003 S.C. LEXIS 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that when determining whether a prenuptial agreement should be enforced, a court must consider “(1) Was the agreement obtained through fraud, duress, or mistake, or through misrepresentation or nondisclosure of material facts? (2
stating that when determining whether a prenuptial agreement should be enforced, a court must consider “(1) Was the agreement obtained through fraud, duress, or mistake, or through misrepresentation or nondisclosure of material facts? (2) Is the agreement unconscionable? (3
explaining the first prong of the test is whether a prenuptial agreement was obtained through fraud, duress, mistake, or through misrepresentation or nondisclosure of material facts
an agreement was not obtained through fraud, duress, mistake, or misrepresentation
“The judicial function of a court of law is to enforce a contract as made by the parties, and not to rewrite or to distort, under the guise of judicial construction, contracts, the terms of which are plain and unambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.