Skip to main content

Gant v. Gant

Citations

  • 329 S.E.2d 106
  • 174 W. Va. 740
  • 53 A.L.R. 4th 1
  • 1985 W. Va. LEXIS 542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “marriage can be of substantial economic, as well as emotional value to a financially weak party”
  • burden of demonstrating invalidity of antenuptial agreement is on the party asserting the agreement’s invalidity
  • “The institution of marriage still confers substantial benefits on both the couple involved and society as a whole .... ”
  • “Unless a prenuptial agreement is so outrageous as to come within uneonscionability principles as developed in commercial contract law, ... West Virginia courts will not evaluate the substantive fairness of prenuptial agreements!
  • general contract law governs antenuptial agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.