Harbor Ins. Co. v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the excessiveness of the award was evidence that the prejudicial conduct complained of by the appellant influenced the trial
• finding that the excessiveness of the award was “evidence that the prejudicial conduct complained of by appellant was in fact so extensive that its influence pervaded the trial to the point that it was impossible for appellant to receive a fair trial”
• jury award so excessive as to be evidence that it was based on emotion and sympathy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).