Kane Furniture Corp. v. Miranda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that carpet installers were independent contractors as a matter of law where only one of the Restatement factors favored the conclusion that the carpet installers were employees
• describing \the usual amenities associated with an employment relationship\ as including \fringe benefits\ and \health care insurance\
• “Once an employee deviates from the scope of his employment, he may return to his employment by doing something which meaningfully benefits his employer's interests.”
• even though carpet seller drew carpet installation layout plan, carpet installers had unbridled discretion in performance of tasks, were engaged in their own independent installation business, and supplied their own equipment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).