Harbison v. Little

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the same standard for futility applies to a Rule 15(d) motion to supplement as a Rule 15(a) motion to amend
• “If a plaintiff fails to include arguments regarding a claim in a post-trial brief, the court is justified in finding that the plaintiff has abandoned that claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
  S.D. New York· 2014-03-04· cited 49×
• Faulkner v. Kornman (In re Heritage Organization L.L.C.)
  N.D. Texas· 2012-01-18· cited 1×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baze v. Rees
  Supreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,040×
• Colvin v. Caruso
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-05-13· cited 610×
• Winget v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-08-11· cited 256×
• American Civil Liberties Union v. McCreary County
  Sixth Circuit· 2010-06-09· cited 202×
• Good v. Ohio Edison Co.
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-07-21· cited 153×
• Dixon v. Clem
  Sixth Circuit· 2007-07-10· cited 146×
• Spies v. Voinovich
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-09-30· cited 111×
• United States v. Thomas L. Marlow
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-01-24· cited 35×
• Amara v. Cigna Corp.
  D. Connecticut· 2008-02-15· cited 34×
• Coston v. Petro
  S.D. Ohio· 2005-11-07· cited 25×
• Harbison v. Little
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 22×
• Harbison v. Little
  M.D. Tennessee· 2007-09-19· cited 15×
• United States v. Livecchi
  W.D. New York· 2009-03-31· cited 12×
• Coalition of Concerned Citizens Against I-670 v. Damian
  S.D. Ohio· 1984-12-12· cited 9×