Hanna v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding there was no actual conflict where none of the codefendants conveyed any desire to testify against the other codefendants in exchange for dismissal or reduction of charges
• “[w]here it is the government which moves to disqualify defense counsel, the burden is on the government to show that any infringement on the defendant’s choice of counsel is justified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ehlers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-07-20· cited 58×
• State Ex Rel. Blake v. Hatcher
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 28×
• Latta v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-16· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Michael A.P. v. Miller
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-03-24· cited 13×
• Robertson v. Wittenmyer
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-19· cited 8×
• Latta v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-24· cited 2×
• Jerry Jones v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-31
• Edwards v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-27

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Holloway v. Arkansas
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,478×
• Wheat v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
• Flanagan v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
• United States v. Richard A. Diozzi, United States of America v. Diane M. Diozzi
  First Circuit· 1986-12-16· cited 67×
• Alcocer v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-12-20· cited 22×
• Barham v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-10-18· cited 15×
• Clinton Bush v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-06-20· cited 10×
• Ward v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-04-26· cited 8×