Hanks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that assertion that accused “was not in Jackson, Michigan at the time that the crime, if any, was committed” is not sufficient to raise issue of identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Hearing
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-01-07· cited 12×
• Brandon L. Jenkins v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-11-23
• Ex Parte David Hearing
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-01-07
• Ex Parte: Humberto Camarillo
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2010-07-14
• Ex Parte Elizabeth Provost
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2011-10-26
• Kenneth Wilkie AKA James Hartley v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2016-07-26
• Ex Parte Richard Vincent Letizia
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2019-02-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Doran
  Supreme Court· 1978-12-18· cited 640×
• Ex Parte Martinez
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-12-17· cited 64×
• Ex Parte Scarbrough
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-07-16· cited 57×
• Ex Parte Nelson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-12· cited 35×
• Ex Parte Connelly
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-09· cited 10×
• Ex Parte Johnson
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1983-05-17· cited 6×