Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/22/2003
Hancock v. State
Citations
- 786 N.E.2d 1142
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 678
- 2003 WL 1916843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that trial court's action pre-certification was \premature and should be considered as a nullity\
- holding trial court’s action in resentencing defendant following remand on appeal before appellate decision was certified as final “was premature and should be considered as a nullity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Sharpnack, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.