Skip to main content

Hancock v. State

Citations

  • 786 N.E.2d 1142
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 678
  • 2003 WL 1916843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that trial court's action pre-certification was \premature and should be considered as a nullity\
  • holding trial court’s action in resentencing defendant following remand on appeal before appellate decision was certified as final “was premature and should be considered as a nullity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Sharpnack, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.