Skip to main content

Hancock v. State

Citations

  • 299 So. 2d 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding confession admissible after Miranda warnings were given where defendant had an IQ of 87 and was considered \dull normal\
  • holding confession admissible after Miranda warnings were given where defendant had an IQ of 87 and was considered \dull normal\
  • holding confession admissible after Miranda warnings were given where defendant had an IQ of 87 and was considered \dull normal\
  • holding confession admissible after Miranda warnings were given where defendant had an IQ of 87 and was considered \dull normal\
  • confession held admissible after Miranda warnings were given where defendant had an IQ of 87 and was considered \dull normal\
  • dull normal man's confession admissible after Miranda warnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.