Skip to main content

Hammond v. State

Citations

  • 594 N.E.2d 509
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1068
  • 1992 WL 145037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that the trial court was not obligated to believe Hammond’s testimony
  • providing that the trial court was not obligated to believe Hammond’s testimony
  • recusal not required based on prior representation of defendant in unrelated criminal matters
  • prior representation in unrelated erim-inal matter did not warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Barteau, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.