District of Columbia· 2/10/2015
Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.
Citations
- 79 F. Supp. 3d 234
- 2015 WL 525765
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15799
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he 90-day clock begins the day after the date of receipt of the EEOC right to sue letter.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-10· cited 63×
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2016-12-06· cited 15×
- Bean v. PerdueD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 8×
- Gross v. WrightDistrict of Columbia· 2016-05-13· cited 6×
- Haynes v. Dc Water is LifeDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-22· cited 5×
- Cousart v. Metro Transit Police ChiefDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-28· cited 3×
- Spencer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-04· cited 3×
- Brooks v. Goodwill of Greater WashingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-25
- Entines v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-05
- Wanda Savage v. Sylvia BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2016-08-03
- Hargrove v. AarpDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-09
- Bean v. VilsackDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-27
- Rasheed v. Dc Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia· 2019-08-06
- Byrne v. Clinton FoundationDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-13
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sol Mexican Grill LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2019-11-12
- Weng v. PerezDistrict of Columbia· 2020-07-08
- McCrea v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-31
- Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-02
- Jackson-Pringle v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2022-07-28
- Hobson v. Ratp Dev USADistrict of Columbia· 2023-02-22
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court· 1984-06-04· cited 1,661×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 1994-06-07· cited 261×
- Elizabeth SHERLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1996-05-10· cited 216×
- Schnellbaecher v. Baskin Clothing Co.Seventh Circuit· 1989-10-05· cited 173×
- Shirley C. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company of MarylandD.C. Circuit· 1978-11-08· cited 149×
- Schuler v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPD.C. Circuit· 2008-02-12· cited 94×
- Unnamed caseSeventh Circuit· 1981-10-07· cited 92×
- Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-24· cited 89×
- Michael J. Olsen v. Marshall & Ilsley CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2001-09-25· cited 78×
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-07-03· cited 78×
- Lewis v. Conners Steel Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1982-04-23· cited 74×
- Ellis v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-06· cited 53×
- Kalinoski v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia· 2006-05-25· cited 48×
- Bernstein v. National Liberty International Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-04-07· cited 44×
Other cases named Hammel v. Marsh USA Inc.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.