Kalinoski v. Gutierrez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying an employer summary judgment even though plaintiff’s showing of discrimination was “based entirely upon evidence that either tends to negate defendant’s explanation or (in some cases
• inferring a shifting rationale where the plaintiff's supervisor mentioned that plaintiff was replaced because of her job performance, yet, during a deposition, the plaintiff's supervisor stated that he had no concerns about the plaintiff's work performance
• inferring a shifting rationale where the plaintiff’s supervisor had mentioned that it replaced the plaintiff because of her job performance, yet, during a deposition, the plaintiff’s supervisor stated that he had no concerns about the plaintiff’s work performance
• “Title VII, of course, does not say that retaliation must be. immediate for it to.be actionable.”
• “[E]vidence of alternate justifications tends to undercut the proffered explanation . . . .”
• “[A] person who is told repeatedly that he is not wanted, has no future, and can’t count on ever getting another raise would not be acting unreasonably if he decided that to remain with this employer would necessarily be . . . intolerable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).