Hamilton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o conclude that an action or inaction taken by a trial attorney was a strategic decision generally requires an evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-16· cited 15×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-23· cited 6×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-07-18· cited 5×
• Carver v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-05-10

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 250×
• Mansfield v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-03-30· cited 148×
• Maharaj v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-30· cited 76×
• Johnston v. Dugger
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-06-20· cited 22×
• Guisasola v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 15×
• Sampson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-20· cited 12×
• Perez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-11· cited 2×
• Barychko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-03· cited 1×