District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/8/2000
Hamilton v. State
Citations
- 752 So. 2d 133
- 2000 WL 256158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of a rule 3.800(a) motion in part because \the record attachments included by the trial court appear to refute the claim\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-04· cited 4×
- Battles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 3×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-06· cited 2×
- Amos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-05· cited 2×
- Toto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 2×
- Graham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-30· cited 1×
- ROGER HEARE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-10-16
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-20
- Inguaggiato v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-01
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.