Hamilton v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nine year old boy was savagely attacked by three dogs; evidence established that dogs’ owners were aware of previous biting incidents involving two of the dogs held sufficient to support finding that owners had actual knowledge of dogs’ vicious propensities
• nine year old boy was savagely attacked by three dogs; evidence established that dogs' owners were aware of previous biting incidents involving two of the dogs held sufficient to support finding that owners had actual knowledge of dogs' vicious propensities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bramble v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-16· cited 83×
• Slack v. Villari
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-06-11· cited 26×
• Finneran v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1968-05-08· cited 24×
• Abraham v. Moler
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-04-10· cited 19×
• McDonald v. Burgess
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-07-01· cited 18×
• Williams v. MORAN, ETC.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1967-12-12· cited 18×
• Hammond v. Robins
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-13· cited 16×
• Moura v. Randall
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-06· cited 15×
• Frisoen v. Trapp
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-07-08· cited 4×
• Freishtat v. Callow
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-04· cited 2×
• Benton v. Aquarium, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-03· cited 1×