Skip to main content
· 11/13/1984

Hammond v. Robins

Citations

  • 483 A.2d 379
  • 60 Md. App. 430
  • 1984 Md. App. LEXIS 429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • homeowner permitted a dog to leave an enclosed yard knowing of dog's propensity to cross the street when unrestrained
  • homeowner permitted a dog to leave an enclosed yard knowing of dog’s propensity to cross the street when unrestrained
  • violation of county animal control ordinance as evidence of negligence where unleashed' dog caused bicycle accident
  • primary purpose of dog ordinances and statutes is protection of the public from injury or damages
  • “appellant violated the Carroll County Animal Ordinance by not keeping the dog under restraint and by allowing the dog to leave the property unattended and unrestrained”
  • dog foreseeably ran into street and caused bicycle riders to fall and sustain injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins, Bloom, Getty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.