Hamilton v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that immigration judges are authorized to examine PSRs to determine whether a crime qualifies as an \aggravated felony\
• holding that immigration judges are authorized to examine PSRs to determine whether a crime qualifies as an “aggravated felony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rodriguez-Heredia v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-05-10· cited 30×
• Thoung v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 2019-01-22· cited 20×
• Maria Arce Fuentes v. Loretta E. Lynch
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-06-10· cited 10×
• Lionel Bogle v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-12-29· cited 6×
• DAMASO-MENDOZA v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-08-09· cited 4×
• Lionel Bogle v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-06-23· cited 1×
• Rodriguez-Heredia v. Holder, Jr.
  Tenth Circuit· 2011-04-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
• Shepard v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
• Nijhawan v. Holder
  Supreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
• Sarr v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-01-22· cited 134×
• United States v. West
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-12-10· cited 78×
• Herrera-Castillo v. Holder
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 50×
• United States v. Venegas-Ornelas
  Tenth Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 44×
• Batrez Gradiz v. Gonzales
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-06-20· cited 24×