First Circuit· 1/21/2009
Hamilton v. Appolon (In Re Hamilton)
Citations
- 399 B.R. 717
- 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 96
- 2009 WL 143731
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[a]n order denying reconsideration is final if the underlying order was final and together they end the litigation on the merits”
- “An order dismissing an adversary proceeding is a final order as it ends the litigation on the merits of the complaint.”
- “An order dismissing an adversary proceeding is a final order as it ends the litigation on the merits of the complaint.”
- “An order dismissing an adversary proceeding is a final order as it ends the litigation on -6- No. 14-8009, In re SII Liquidation Company the merits of the complaint.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haines, Kornreich, Tester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Aja v. Emigrant Funding Corp. (In Re Aja)First Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 22×
- Reynolds v. Bank of Canton (In Re Reynolds)D. Massachusetts· 2011-08-02· cited 11×
- Melo v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC (Melo)First Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 11×
- Travers v. Bank of America, N.A. (In re Travers)D. Rhode Island· 2014-03-25· cited 11×
- Aja v. Fitzgerald (In Re Aja)First Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 10×
- Schwab v. Oscar (In re SII Liquidation Co.)Sixth Circuit· 2014-09-15· cited 9×
- McVay v. Perez (In Re Perez)D. Colorado· 2009-05-20· cited 6×
- In re: SII Liquidation v.Sixth Circuit· 2014-09-15
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 1,101×
- Fleet Data Processing Corp. v. Branch (In Re Bank of New England Corp.)First Circuit· 1998-03-10· cited 284×
- The Independent Oil and Chemical Workers of Quincy, Inc. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyFirst Circuit· 1988-12-28· cited 222×
- In Re Erwin A. Porges, Also Known as E. Allen Porges, Debtor. Erwin A. Porges, Also Known as E. Allen Porges v. Gruntal & Company, IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1995-01-05· cited 157×
- In Re: John G. Pattullo in Re: Susan F. Pattullo, Debtors. United States Internal Revenue Vacating Service v. John G. Pattullo Susan F. PattulloNinth Circuit· 2001-11-21· cited 140×
- Robson v. HallenbeckFirst Circuit· 1996-04-03· cited 134×
- Kowalski v. GagneFirst Circuit· 1990-09-14· cited 129×
- In Re David Lee Carraher and Phyllis Diane Carraher, Debtors. David L. Carraher Phyllis D. Carraher, and Ronald C. Lapekas v. Morgan Electronics, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1992-07-28· cited 122×
- New England Power & Marine, Inc. v. Town of Tyngsborough (In Re Middlesex Power Equipment & Marine, Inc.)First Circuit· 2002-06-11· cited 99×
- Chamorro v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc.First Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 95×
- In the Matter of Jimmie L. QUERNER, Sr., Debtor. Thera QUERNER, Appellant, v. Jimmie L. QUERNER, Jr., AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1993-11-26· cited 92×
- Velez-Cortes v. Awning Windows, Inc.First Circuit· 2004-07-09· cited 82×
- In the Matter of Statistical Tabulating Corp., Inc., Debtor. Appeal of United States of AmericaSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-02· cited 80×
- In Re: Martha M. Bernal, Debtor. Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Martha M. BernalNinth Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 58×
- Maher v. HydeFirst Circuit· 2001-12-03· cited 45×
- Eresian v. Koza (Koza)First Circuit· 2007-09-11· cited 41×
- Smith v. Commercial Banking Corp. (In re Smith)Third Circuit· 1989-01-12· cited 31×
- Crossman v. Raytheon Long Term Disability PlanFirst Circuit· 2002-12-31· cited 22×
- Premier Capital, LLC v. Gavin (In Re Gavin)First Circuit· 2004-12-16· cited 19×
- Balzotti v. RAD Investments, LLC (In Re Shepherds Hill Development Co.)First Circuit· 2004-11-04· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.