· 1/19/2011
Aja v. Emigrant Funding Corp. (In Re Aja)
Citations
- 442 B.R. 857
- 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 131
- 2011 WL 167034
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that pro se litigants are not “granted immunity” from compliance with procedural and substantive law
- stating that while pro se litigants are held to a “‘less stringent procedural standard tha[n] others,’” they are not “granted immunity” from compliance with procedural and substantive law
- ruling Panel may take judicial notice of the proceedings in bankruptcy court
- holding Panel may take judicial notice of the bankruptcy court proceedings
- stating pro se litigants are not granted immunity from compliance with procedural and substantive law
- bankruptcy court’s ruling was consistent with “cases holding that there cannot be a reorganization in prospect in a chapter 7 case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Votolato, Lamoutte, Tester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.