Skip to main content
· 1/19/2011

Aja v. Emigrant Funding Corp. (In Re Aja)

Citations

  • 442 B.R. 857
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 131
  • 2011 WL 167034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that pro se litigants are not “granted immunity” from compliance with procedural and substantive law
  • stating that while pro se litigants are held to a “‘less stringent procedural standard tha[n] others,’” they are not “granted immunity” from compliance with procedural and substantive law
  • ruling Panel may take judicial notice of the proceedings in bankruptcy court
  • holding Panel may take judicial notice of the bankruptcy court proceedings
  • stating pro se litigants are not granted immunity from compliance with procedural and substantive law
  • bankruptcy court’s ruling was consistent with “cases holding that there cannot be a reorganization in prospect in a chapter 7 case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Votolato, Lamoutte, Tester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.