Hallock v. Bonner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[P]laintiffs' earlier procedural loss does not prevent them from pursuing enforcement of their substantive rights against the proper defendants.\
• “[Plaintiffs’ earlier procedural loss does not prevent them from pursuing enforcement of their substantive rights against the proper defendants.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Will v. Hallock
  Supreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 526×
• Hallock v. Bonner
  Second Circuit· 2004-10-22· cited 21×
• Hallock v. Bonner
  N.D. New York· 2008-07-28· cited 4×
• James King v. United States
  Sixth Circuit· 2022-09-21· cited 3×
• Donahue v. Connolly
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-09-13· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Kanti A. Patel v. Contemporary Classics of Beverly Hills and Herbert Schachter, Alan Neadle
  Second Circuit· 2001-08-03· cited 277×
• Gasho v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-11-02· cited 270×
• Farmer v. Perrill
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-12-26· cited 114×
• Jose Serra, Cross-Appellant v. Paul A. Pichardo, Cross-Appellee, Robert Elsea, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-03-24· cited 51×
• Robert Arevalo v. Chuck Woods
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-02-24· cited 45×
• Lorna Kreines v. United States of America, and Jack McMenimen Wayne Yamashita
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-03-26· cited 41×
• Rodriguez v. Handy
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-05-26· cited 10×
• Hostetler v. United States
  E.D. Virginia· 2000-04-18· cited 9×
• Barbera v. Smith
  S.D. New York· 1987-02-09· cited 7×