Skip to main content

Hallman v. Hallman

Citations

  • 575 So. 2d 738
  • 1991 WL 22976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he husband’s superior earning ability ... is not a factor for purposes of equitable distribution of assets.”
  • superior earning ability is not a factor for purposes of equitable distribution of marital assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cobb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.