Dease v. Dease

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the lower court’s designation that parties would receive “the property in [their] possession and control” when “[t]he property was neither itemized nor valued nor is there any indication that the property is marital or separate” (alteration in original)
• ‘While disparate earning abilities may justify alimony (and the court awarded alimony), it does not, at least without more explanation, justify an unequal distribution of marital assets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).