Hall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a taking results when a governmental actor physically occupies private property
• explaining that, when the government exercises its eminent domain power to take property for public use without first initiating condemnation proceedings, the property owner can bring an inverse condemnation action to obtain just compensation for that de facto taking
• describing the requirements for takings claims based on government regulation and government zoning or planning actions
• explaining that “a de facto taking results when a govern- mental actor physically occupies private property or invades a private property right in a way that substantially inter- feres with the owner’s use and enjoyment of the property, thereby reducing its value”
• explaining that “a de facto taking results when a govern- mental actor physically occupies private property or invades a private property right in a way that substantially inter- feres with the owner’s use and enjoyment of the property, thereby reducing its value”
• “[Njothing in Lincoln Loan suggests that, in the absence of a physical occupation or invasion of a property right, a government action that causes only a reduction in the value of property qualifies as a taking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Alderwoods (Oregon), Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 13×
• Scharfstein v. BP W. Coast Prods., LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-31· cited 7×
• Foster Group, Inc. v. City of Elgin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-30· cited 7×
• Tapio Investment Co. I v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-10-27· cited 6×
• Walton v. Neskowin Regional Sanitary Authority
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-05-23

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-06-20· cited 141×
• Thornburg v. Port of Portland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-11-07· cited 110×
• Suess Builders Co. v. City of Beaverton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 72×
• Tomasek v. Oregon State Highway Commission
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1952-09-24· cited 54×
• Gearin v. Marion County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-03-04· cited 50×
• Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-04-10· cited 48×
• Cereghino v. State Highway Commission
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-04-18· cited 39×
• Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'n
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-22· cited 38×
• Coast Range Conifers, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Board of Forestry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 37×
• Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 32×
• Thornburg v. Port of Portland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-06-22· cited 27×
• Dodd v. Hood River County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-22· cited 26×
• Jacobson v. Crown Zellerbach Corporation
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-09-05· cited 19×
• Kurtz v. Southern Pacific Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1916-02-29· cited 17×
• MOELLER ET UX v. Multnomah County
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-30· cited 14×
• Mosier v. Oregon Navigation Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1901-04-08· cited 14×
• West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West Linn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-09-23· cited 13×
• Dunn v. City of Milwaukie
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 12×
• Stuart v. Pittman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-06-03· cited 7×
• Hall v. State ex rel. Oregon Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-10-10· cited 2×