Oregon Supreme Court· 3/4/1924
Gearin v. Marion County
Citations
- 110 Or. 390
- 223 P. 929
- 1924 Ore. LEXIS 205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
- distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts are done with intent to take private property for public use
- distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
- due process provision has no application to a case involving immunity of state or subordinate agency
- Article I, section 10, has \no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state\
- Article I, section 10, has “no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 156×
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 125×
- Texas Highway Department v. WeberTexas Supreme Court· 1949-03-23· cited 118×
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 82×
- Figueroa v. StateHawaii Supreme Court· 1979-12-31· cited 79×
- County of Herkimer v. Village of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-05-12· cited 53×
- Renninger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1950-01-12· cited 36×
- Vokoun v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court· 2002-10-24· cited 32×
- Brewer v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-10· cited 30×
- Albers v. WhitleyD. Oregon· 1982-08-31· cited 27×
- Hanson v. MosserOregon Supreme Court· 1967-04-26· cited 25×
- Johnson v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 17×
- MOELLER ET UX v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1959-10-30· cited 14×
- Gunn v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 13×
- Dunn v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 12×
- Ogle v. BillickOregon Supreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 11×
- Figueroa v. StateHawaii Supreme Court· 1980-02-26· cited 11×
- Wickman v. Housing AuthorityOregon Supreme Court· 1952-08-13· cited 10×
- Building Concepts, Ltd. v. PickeringIdaho Court of Appeals· 1988-07-26· cited 9×
- Hall v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2014-05-30· cited 7×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1911-05-29· cited 231×
- Templeton v. Linn CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1892-04-30· cited 48×
- Grant County v. Lake CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1889-04-15· cited 38×
- Yamhill County v. FosterOregon Supreme Court· 1909-01-19· cited 30×
- State v. Baker CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1893-06-19· cited 21×
- Platt v. NewbergOregon Supreme Court· 1922-03-21· cited 21×
- Rapp v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1915-10-19· cited 12×
- Clark v. Coos CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1916-12-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.