Skip to main content

Gearin v. Marion County

Citations

  • 110 Or. 390
  • 223 P. 929
  • 1924 Ore. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
  • distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts are done with intent to take private property for public use
  • distinguishing eminent domain from tort, in part, by whether governmental acts done with intent to take private property for public use
  • due process provision has no application to a case involving immunity of state or subordinate agency
  • Article I, section 10, has \no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state\
  • Article I, section 10, has “no application to an action sounding in tort when brought against the state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.