Hall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [trial] court abused its discretion by denying Hall’s pretrial suppression motion because the State failed to prove the reliability of the LIDAR technology on which the officer relied to determine Hall was speeding. Accordingly, we sustain Hall’s sole issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-09-16· cited 19×
• Lesle Markle v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-02-05
• Hall, Phillip Jason
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-09-16
• Markle, Lesle
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-04-23

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kelly v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-05· cited 1,156×
• Emerson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-13· cited 407×
• Bagheri v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-11-05· cited 324×
• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-04· cited 179×
• Icke v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2001-01-25· cited 62×
• Owens v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-04-22· cited 42×
• Bagheri v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-06-28· cited 41×
• People v. Canulli
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-30· cited 40×
• Ochoa v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1999-05-20· cited 33×
• State v. Rudd
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-07-02· cited 24×