People v. Canulli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the use of Lidar laser technology to measure the speed of an automobile constitutes ‘new’ or ‘novel’ evidence” and therefore, an evidentiary hearing conducted pursuant to Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923
• stating that appellate review is limited to the record on appeal
• stating that appellate review is limited to the record on appeal
• stating that appellate review is limited to the record on appeal
• “We find the use of Lidar laser technology to measure the speed of an automobile constitutes ‘new 1 or ‘novel’ evidence.”
• “We find the use of Lidar laser technology to measure the speed of an automobile constitutes ‘new’ or ‘novel’ evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).