Skip to main content

Hall v. State

Citations

  • 158 S.W.3d 470
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 252
  • 2005 WL 356286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that correctional officer’s act of pushing defendant toward cell to end encounter after verbal warning failed was within scope of officer’s lawful duties
  • concluding that an officer was lawfully discharging his official duties when he shoved an inmate toward his cell after the inmate refused to follow an instruction to “move on”
  • stating that the second step requires a court to “evaluate[] the evidence in the context of the entire record”
  • stating that correctional officer’s use of force within definition of section 9.53 is lawful
  • referring to Aguilar v. State, 682 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985), and Rousseau v. State, 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)
  • referring to Aguilar v. State , 682 S.W.2d 556, 558 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985), and Rousseau v. State , 855 S.W.2d 666, 672 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.