Hall v. Hall
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 81
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in modifying the parties' shared parenting plan to require adult supervision of the parties' children after school. The court considered the best interest factors set forth in R.C. 3109.04(F)(1), including testimony about the wishes of the parents and children, the children's adjustment to the Boys & Girls Club, and the children's level of maturity, before finding it was in the children's best interest to have adult supervision after school until their father returned home from work.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Vaughn v. VaughnOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-31· cited 13×
- Thompson v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-06· cited 6×
- In re A.C.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-18· cited 2×
- Suwareh v. NwankwoOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-28· cited 1×
- Woeste v. WoesteOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-15· cited 1×
- Gebremikael v. ArumaOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-17· cited 1×
- Garrett v. KronkOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.