Gebremikael v. Aruma

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3686

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to adjust appellant's child support obligation where appellant alleged that he had another child in Nigeria but failed to provide any documentation of the child's existence. The court's use of a different worksheet than the one provided in R.C. 3119.022 is not reversible error in this case. The trial court did not err in allocating appellant's tax refund to spousal support arrears as the court has the authority to determine that a spouse's separate property may not be awarded to them and there was no evidence that appellant had paid any spousal support. The trial court did not err in determining that a vehicle was marital property and specific credit card charges were separate debt where appellant failed to provide testimony or evidence to the contrary.