Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/19/1991
Hall v. Hall
Citations
- 472 N.W.2d 217
- 238 Neb. 686
- 1991 Neb. LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding “a tax dependency exemption is nearly identical in nature to an award of child support or alimony” and citing similar conclusions from other jurisdictions
- applying federal presumption of dependency exemption to custodial parent where decree did not specifically allocate exemption
- any Nebraska state court having jurisdiction in divorce action has power to allocate dependency exemptions as part of divorce decree and to order custodial parent to execute waiver of his or her right to declare tax exemptions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant, Fahrnbruch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kalkowski v. KalkowskiNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 243×
- Trieweiler Ex Rel. Varsity Investments, Inc. v. SearsNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-12-17· cited 146×
- State on Behalf of Pathammavong v. PathammavongNebraska Supreme Court· 2004-05-21· cited 113×
- Foster v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court· 2003-05-30· cited 89×
- Emery v. MoffettNebraska Supreme Court· 2005-05-27· cited 57×
- Weaver v. WeaverNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-02-12· cited 36×
- Prochaska v. ProchaskaNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-01-06· cited 30×
- Shiers v. ShiersNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 16×
- MacIas v. MacIasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-10-07· cited 10×
- Hudson v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-04-24· cited 10×
- Aguilar v. SchulteNebraska Court of Appeals· 2014-06-10
- Kolar v. TesterNebraska Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27
- Bayne v. BayneNebraska Supreme Court· 2019-04-12
- Sanderson v. SandersonNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-10-18
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cross v. CrossWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 106×
- Abboud v. Lakeview, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-03-01· cited 98×
- Niederkorn v. NiederkornMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-04-28· cited 95×
- Hughes v. HughesOhio Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 92×
- Neujahr v. NeujahrNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-09-05· cited 86×
- Huffman v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-08-10· cited 67×
- Lincoln v. LincolnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-08-11· cited 46×
- Serrano v. SerranoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-11-21· cited 41×
- Schulze v. SchulzeNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-10· cited 39×
- Miller v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 69 OF PAWNEE CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-03-13· cited 39×
- In Re Marriage of EinhornAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-09-23· cited 36×
- Marriage of Pergolski v. PergolskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-01-19· cited 35×
- National Mortgage Loan Co. v. HurstNebraska Supreme Court· 1930-07-01· cited 32×
- Wilson v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-24· cited 30×
- McKenzie v. JahnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-12-06· cited 26×
- Babka v. BabkaNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-03-09· cited 19×
- Morisch v. MorischNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-10-05· cited 19×
- Citizens State Bank v. Jennings State BankNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 6×
- Kouth v. KouthNebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-31· cited 3×
- State v. EasleyNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-12-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.