Hall v. Allstate Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that insureds ignored a provision that immediately preceded the relied-upon sentence and that “[t]o an extent, [insureds] look past portions of the policy and read the sentence in isolation”
• reversing a judgment for stacking where policy stated “THAT NO STACKING OR AGGREGATION OF UNDERINSURED MOTORISTS INSURANCE WHATSOEVER WILL BE ALLOWED BY THIS POLICY.”
• “This clause, written in a way to draw attention to itself, is clear, direct, straightforward, and unifprmly consistent with all the other language in. the policy that unambiguously and unequivocally prohibits the stacking of coverages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).