District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/28/1992
Halicki v. United States
Citations
- 614 A.2d 499
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 229
- 1992 WL 210657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- aiding and abetting CPWL; there was no evidence that Hal-icki “in any way facilitated the initial acquisition of the weapons ... or that she played any role in the continued dominion and control over them by [her co-defendants].”
- court has occasionally equated concepts of “carrying” and “possession” without discussing whether concepts are in fact same
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Schwelb, and King, Associate Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-26· cited 134×
- Jamel Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-08-06· cited 54×
- McCullough v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-26· cited 37×
- White v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-06-11· cited 22×
- Lancaster v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-07-09· cited 19×
- Walker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-22· cited 17×
- Fox v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-27· cited 13×
- Tyree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-07-29· cited 9×
- Lucas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-26· cited 7×
- Wallace G. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 7×
- Merle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-09-30· cited 5×
- Henderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-12· cited 5×
- Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 3×
- Clyburn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-06-28· cited 3×
- Joya v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 3×
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-09-19· cited 2×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-10-24· cited 1×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 1,620×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-01-17· cited 1,616×
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 873×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-03-27· cited 65×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-08-05· cited 52×
- United States v. FelderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-16· cited 50×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-01-28· cited 44×
- Rouse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-05-23· cited 36×
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-12-01· cited 34×
- Copening v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-12· cited 33×
- Waterstaat v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-04-25· cited 32×
- Jefferson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-07-07· cited 31×
- Brown v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1929-01-07· cited 25×
- United States v. Charles v. GentileSeventh Circuit· 1987-05-21· cited 24×
- United States v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-05-07· cited 24×
- Jefferson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-04-27· cited 24×
- Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-11-27· cited 24×
- Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-04-06· cited 16×
Other cases named Halicki v. United States
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.