Haley v. Haley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that upon determining the trial court abused its discretion by dividing property by values not in evidence, “it is our duty to reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the property issue to the trial court for a new trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Capellen v. Capellen
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1994-12-14· cited 57×
• Guardianship of Zeke
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-04-10· cited 10×
• Coggin v. Coggin
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-10-29· cited 8×
• Juan Hernandez v. Yolanda Hernandez
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2010-09-30
• M.G. v. T.G.
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2023-02-23

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bell v. Bell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 229×
• McKnight v. McKnight
  Texas Supreme Court· 1976-11-24· cited 164×
• Perry v. Ponder
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-08-19· cited 46×
• Mata v. Mata
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1986-05-08· cited 40×
• Dunker v. Dunker
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-08-18· cited 20×
• Clark v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1962-11-29· cited 12×
• Vickerstaff v. Vickerstaff
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1965-05-26· cited 8×