Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2/11/1999
Hale v. State
Citations
- 985 S.W.2d 303
- 336 Ark. 345
- 1999 Ark. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that circuit court did not abuse its discretion in declaring a mistrial when the defendant became ill and was unavailable for trial and the jury would have had to be sworn for over two months in a highly publicized trial
- Prosecution for violation of Arkansas law after the defendant entered plea bargain on federal charges arising from the same conduct fell within the dual- sovereignty doctrine and thus did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause under the facts of the case.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-07· cited 49×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2007-11-29· cited 25×
- GSS, LLC v. Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2014-04-03· cited 14×
- Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-06-17· cited 13×
- Taylor v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-03-09· cited 10×
- Emerald Development Co. v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-05-14· cited 4×
- Abdulhakim Muhammad v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2020-01-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.