Hale v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a specific UIFSA provision controlled rather than one in the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure regarding when a support judgment became dormánt
• acknowledging that interest was included in out-of-state child support award, but reversing on other grounds
• “Resolution of this issue involves the interpretation of Kansas and Oklahoma statutes, matters over which our review is unlimited.”
• “Although there are circumstances in which courts, and parties to a certain extent, may choose which state’s law will apply in a given dispute, when the choice of law is dictated by statute, courts do not have the authority to contradict such mandates.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Scott
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-06-03· cited 16×
• Bell v. Heflin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2016-11-10· cited 15×
• State v. Chesbro
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-05-12· cited 13×
• Martin v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-04-10· cited 8×
• Dia v. Oakley
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-10-23· cited 2×
• In re Paternity of M.H.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2016-11-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williamson v. City of Hays
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 89×
• Cooper v. Werholtz
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 68×