Skip to main content
· 1/30/2004

Cooper v. Werholtz

Citations

  • 83 P.3d 1212
  • 277 Kan. 250
  • 2004 Kan. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate courts have unlimited review over issues involving statutory interpretation
  • “Criminal statutes and penalties in effect at the time of the criminal act are controlling.”
  • \Criminal statutes and penalties in effect at the time of the criminal act are controlling.\
  • statutory interpretation a question of law subject to unlimited appellate review
  • interpretation of a statute is a question of law
  • appellate review of statutory interpretation is unlimited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.