Hale v. Coffin
Citations
- 120 F. 470
- 57 C.C.A. 528
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 4497
Syllabus
<p>1. Wills — Limitation of Action to Charge Legatee — Maine Statute.</p> <p>The statute of Maine (Rev. St. Me. c. 87), which provides that, where a claim against the estate of a decedent is not filed in the prohate office as therein authorized, “the claimant may have remedy against the heirs or devisees of the estate within one year after it becomes due,” is a statute of limitations applicable to all claims founded upon a legal demand, in whatever court they may be asserted, state or federal, and whether in an action at law, which is recognized by the practice of the state as a proper remedy, or whether cognizable in a federal court of equity, independent of statute.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>In the absence of fraud, the fact that a claimant is a nonresident of the state does not prevent his claim from being barred by such statute.</p> <p>8.' Equity — Applying Statute of Limitations — Suit on Legal Demand.</p> <p>A proceeding to enforce the statutory liability of a stockholder, whether at law or in equity, is based on a legal, and not an equitable, right; and, where the right to enforce it at law is barred, a court of equity will apply the same limitation by analogy.</p>
Judges: Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hughes v. ReedTenth Circuit· 1931-01-08· cited 77×
- Ingersoll v. CoramU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1903-12-30· cited 9×
- Todd v. RussellSecond Circuit· 1939-05-08· cited 7×
- Green v. BarrettD. Massachusetts· 1903-04-02· cited 2×
- Ingersoll v. CoramU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1904-08-15· cited 2×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court· 1893-03-06· cited 147×
- Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court· 1896-04-13· cited 110×
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1902-02-03· cited 84×
- Baker v. CummingsSupreme Court· 1898-02-21· cited 44×
- Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 41×
- Morgan v. HamletSupreme Court· 1885-03-02· cited 32×
- Sykes v. MeachamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1869-11-15· cited 20×
- Royce v. BurrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1815-09-15· cited 12×
- Chewett v. MoranU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan· 1883-09-18· cited 10×
- Sampson v. SampsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1874-07-01· cited 6×
- Fowler v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1884-02-25· cited 6×
- Lansing v. StarrNew York Court of Chancery· 1816-07-02· cited 6×
- Continental Nat. Bank v. HeilmanSeventh Circuit· 1898-04-04· cited 5×
- Howes v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1816-09-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.