Skip to main content

Hale v. CDR Operations, Inc.

Citations

  • 474 S.W.3d 129
  • 2015 WL 6560450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[n]othing in KRS [Kentucky Revised Statute] Chapter 342 limits the liability of the employer, in whose employ the date of manifestation occurred, to 5 See, e.g., Basin Energy Co. v. Howard, 447 S.W.3d 179, 187 (Ky. App. 2014
  • holding that “[n]othing in KRS [Kentucky Revised Statute] Chapter 342 limits the liability of the employer, in whose employ the date of manifestation occurred, to 5 See, e.g., Basin Energy Co. v. Howard, 447 S.W.3d 179, 187 (Ky. App. 2014
  • discussing the binding nature of stipulations in workers’ compensation proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Barber, Cunningham, Keller, Minton, Noble, Only, Venters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.