Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a similar bank bond covered losses caused by an employee's intent to defraud her employer, not losses caused by overreaching or \reckless and imprudent\ business judgment
• indicating that a court is bound to accept a stipulation of fact unless the so-called fact is “patently untrue”
• finding a stipulation binding where it was clear that the challenging party was an active participant in drafting the stipulation
• courts must rely upon inferences from tangible manifestations of behavior, not merely upon actor’s subjective mental state to determine intent
• courts must rely upon inferences from tangible manifestations of behavior, not merely upon actor’s subjective mental state to determine intent
• courts must rely upon inferences from tangible manifestations of behavior, not merely upon actor's subjective mental state to determine intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).