Hale v. Anchorage School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that physical therapist was required to file a conforming treatment plan within fourteen days of beginning treatment
• holding that physical therapist was required to file a conforming treatment plan within fourteen days of beginning treatment
• employer became liable for treatment in excess of frequency standards only after board found that conforming treatment plan was timely filed and that treatments were likely to improve employee’s condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bockness v. Brown Jug, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1999-05-28· cited 13×
• Burke v. Houston Nana, L.L.C.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2010-01-08· cited 11×
• Burke v. HOUSTON NANA, LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2010-01-08· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1987-12-04· cited 218×
• Handley v. State, Department of Revenue
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-09-18· cited 148×
• Nenana City School District v. Coghill
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 18×
• Anchorage School District v. Hale
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1993-08-13· cited 16×