Bockness v. Brown Jug, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that controversion notices of specific medical treatment gave employee adequate notice that employer “did not consider them reasonable and necessary”
• holding employer liable only for reasonable and necessary medical care
• construing AS 23.30 as limiting an employer’s responsibility “to medical care that is reasonable and necessary”
• construing Act as requiring employers to pay only for reasonable and necessary medical care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).