Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]y its plain language, § 12 applies to notice, i.e., service, it does not apply to filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2005-02-14· cited 3×