Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]y its plain language, § 12 applies to notice, i.e., service, it does not apply to filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Baguidy v. Boro Transit Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2017-09-30· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Graham v. Henderson
  Second Circuit· 1996-07-11· cited 435×
• Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
  Supreme Court· 1964-01-06· cited 403×
• United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. John Canova
  Second Circuit· 2005-06-21· cited 144×
• American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
  Eleventh Circuit· 1987-08-04· cited 80×
• Mendes Junior International Company v. Banco Do Brasil, S.A. And Bb Leasing Company
  Second Circuit· 2000-06-16· cited 31×
• Jonathan Hakala v. Deutsche Bank Ag (Formerly Bankers Trust Corp.), Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, Inc. (Formerly Bt Securities, Inc.)
  Second Circuit· 2003-09-05· cited 23×
• Albert Greenwood, M.D. v. The State of New York, Office of Mental Health (Omh), Defendants
  Second Circuit· 1988-03-23· cited 21×

Other cases named Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hakala v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2005-02-14· cited 3×