Hajciar v. Crawford & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insurer's termination of benefits in order to coerce a lump sum settlement was not extreme and outrageous for purposes of the intentional infliction tort
• insurer’s termination of benefits in order to coerce a lump sum settlement was not extreme and outrageous for purposes of the intentional infliction tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).