Skip to main content

Haden v. David J. Sacks, P.C.

Citations

  • 332 S.W.3d 503
  • 2009 WL 1270372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a party waives any error arising from possibly awarding nonrecoverable fees when the complaining party does not object to failure to segregate between legal services for which fees are properly recoverable and those for which no recovery of fees is authorized[]”
  • holding attorney's affidavit sufficient to warrant summary judgment when it (1) contained recitals establishing attorney's competency to swear to facts stated and other requirements of Rule of Civil Procedure 166a(f), (2) described work encompassed by the fees sought, and (3
  • holding attorney's affidavit sufficient to warrant summary judgment when it (1) contained recitals establishing attorney's competency to swear to facts stated and other requirements of Rule of Civil Procedure 166a(f), (2) described work encompassed by the fees sought, and (3
  • where nonmovant failed to controvert attorney’s affidavit or otherwise dispute law firm’s evidence, law firm was entitled to statutory presumption that the requested amount was both reasonable and necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sherry Radack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Haden v. David J. Sacks, P.C.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.