Burrow v. Arce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert’s opinion lacked an adequate basis even though the affidavit recited the expert’s familiarity with the case
• holding that a client need not prove actual damages in order to obtain forfeiture of an attorney's fee for the attorney's breach of fiduciary duty to the client
• recognizing that a showing of actual damages is not required to prevail on a claim of breach of fiduciary duty
• recognizing that showing of actual damages not required to prevail on claim of breach of fiduciary duty
• holding that proof of actual damages is not required to obtain fee forfeiture for breach of fiduciary duty
• recognizing that a showing of actual damages is not required to prevail on a claim of breach of fiduciary duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).