Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2/22/2008
Habersham v. State
Citations
- 658 S.E.2d 253
- 289 Ga. App. 718
- 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 702
- 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a defendant’s prior conviction for giving a false name to a police officer was admissible for purposes of impeachment
- defendant’s act of taking the stand made his conviction for giving false information admissible for purposes of impeachment under OCGA § 24-9-84.1 (a) (3), which “does not require the trial court to balance the probative value of such evidence against any prejudicial effect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phipps, Johnson, Mikell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2000-02-14· cited 222×
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-11-08· cited 204×
- Burgess v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1994-12-05· cited 89×
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-09-13· cited 29×
- Guyton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 25×
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-31· cited 19×
- Felder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-03· cited 15×
- Blue v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-09-29· cited 13×
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-30· cited 13×
- Herrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-03-20· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.