Guzman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant’s actual inability to complete a drug purchase because she had no money with her fell within the definition of impossibility set forth in OCGA § 16-4-4
• impossibility defense raised where defendant could not have completed drug purchase because she had no money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-11-10· cited 16×
• Dean v. Gober
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-12-16· cited 13×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-09-24· cited 9×
• Christian v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-22· cited 6×
• Rana v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-01· cited 5×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-10-16· cited 4×
• Durfee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-05-01· cited 4×
• Collins v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-07· cited 3×
• Rayton v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2022-06-22· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Merino v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-05-10· cited 107×
• Orkin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-01-27· cited 75×
• Adsitt v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-09-29· cited 70×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-01-30· cited 36×
• Riddle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1978-02-24· cited 35×
• Fears v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-12-04· cited 19×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-10-20· cited 15×