Orkin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[w]here there is evidence to support the decision of a trial judge on motion to suppress evidence, that decision will not be disturbed on appeal” and concluding that “[t]he facts authorized” the trial court’s fact-findings
• crime of conspiracy can only be defined in conjunction with a substantive crime involved in the conspiracy
• “The crime of conspiracy . . . can only be defined in conjunction with a second criminal Code section, i.e., the substantive crime involved in the conspiracy or attempt.”
• “[CJonspiracy ... can only be defined in conjunction with ... [a] substantive crime_”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).